Grayson's shakedown lawsuit threatens D.C. business
The Washington Examiner has published this editorial by PLF Principal Attorney Deborah J. La Fetra, commenting on the lawsuit that Congressman Alan Grayson has filed in Washington, D.C., against AT&T:
In a case now before D.C.’s local Court of Appeals, Grayson is asking to have the District’s consumer protection ordinance interpreted — or, rather, misinterpreted — to permit lawsuits against businesses even if the plaintiff didn’t suffer any injury.
In other words, this self-described “progressive Democrat” is trying to subvert a key safeguard against frivolous lawsuits: The requirement that the plaintiff show tangible “standing,” including harm caused by the defendant’s conduct.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›