Grayson's shakedown lawsuit threatens D.C. business
The Washington Examiner has published this editorial by PLF Principal Attorney Deborah J. La Fetra, commenting on the lawsuit that Congressman Alan Grayson has filed in Washington, D.C., against AT&T:
In a case now before D.C.’s local Court of Appeals, Grayson is asking to have the District’s consumer protection ordinance interpreted — or, rather, misinterpreted — to permit lawsuits against businesses even if the plaintiff didn’t suffer any injury.
In other words, this self-described “progressive Democrat” is trying to subvert a key safeguard against frivolous lawsuits: The requirement that the plaintiff show tangible “standing,” including harm caused by the defendant’s conduct.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›