Why Chapman and McConnell are wrong about substantive due process

February 28, 2012 | By TIMOTHY SANDEFUR

The conversation about substantive due process is winding down at Cato Unbound. This morning I offer some criticisms of Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnell’s new Yale Law Journal article on the subject.

CASES AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM. SENT TO YOUR INBOX.

Subscribe to the weekly Docket for dispatches from the front lines.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.