Will President Obama take on green extremists within gov't agencies? Unfortunately, probably not . . .
Author: Brandon Middleton
. . . But Hugh Hewitt's message to the President is still worth a read. From his op-ed in yesterday's Washington Examiner:
President Obama can stimulate job growth immediately, but to do so he will have to rein in the environmental activist zealots he has employed throughout the executive branch. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were not designed to become job-killing machines. . . .
Each of these agencies has accomplished some wonderful things, and each continues to contribute important services to the nation, but as the decades have rolled on from the years of the Nixon administration in which all three laws were originally passed, the constant pressure from the environmental left has bent the agencies into an iron triangle of growth-throttling litigation, complexity and inertia.
Farmers in California's great Central Valley, for example, have been denied the water necessary to grow vast amounts of food because of the alleged effects of pumps on the delta smelt, just one of scores of Endangered Species Act fiascoes that have plagued the Golden State for the past 20 years, and which have involved birds that number in the thousands, like the California gnatcatcher, and insects as obscure as the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. . . .
Obama is the chief cheerleader of this regulatory overreach, and all proclamations of his "turn to the center" ignore that the president has done nothing to curb the excesses of these agencies even as he proclaims yet another focus on jobs.
The best jobs program the president could come up with right now is an order to the EPA to abandon its ill-conceived power grab aimed first at refineries and other plants, followed by his express direction to the Corps and the Service to move permit applications from land owners forward without regard to the threats from the far left which are routinely thrown down and which agency personnel cite as reasons for inaction even as joblessness in the building industry cripples many state economies.
If the president pushes his own appointees at these key agencies to concentrate on assisting applicants, approving permits and limiting new regulations, tens of thousands of good jobs building houses, apartments, businesses and the infrastructure to support them will be created in 2011.
learn more about
Center for Environmental Science, Accuracy & Reliability, et al. v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al.
The federal government has expanded its reach using the Endangered Species Act to cover spurious “subspecies.” The ESA does not define “subspecies” and the Fish and Wildlife Service has offered no definition of its own. Instead, it simply announces when it has determined a “subspecies” to exist and, relying on the subspecies’ smaller numbers relative to the entire species, imposes onerous regulations. The California gnatcatcher was listed as a threatened subspecies, but a 2013 study shows that, at a DNA level, the songbird is not meaningfully distinct from millions of gnatcatchers dwelling in Baja California. PLF represents a coalition of property owners, developers, and scientists in a challenge to the continued listing of this thriving species.Read more
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›