A "sharply divided" Washington Supreme Court today issued an unfortunate eminent domain decision. The case involved the notice local governments are required to give property owners before voting to take their property. The court's opinion essentially deems it proper for local governments to decide to seize property without the owners being notified of the meeting where the vote takes place.
Justice Jim Johnson, in his dissent, pretty much sums it up:
The constitutionally limited eminent domain power and important due
process safeguards of our constitution are again disregarded . . . The constitutional right to own property
and the public right to notice of governmental action loses again.
What to read next
In February, eight Black and Hispanic families filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Connecticut State Department of Education’s race-based enrollment quotas for Hartford’s magnet schools. This policy mandates that 25% of a … ›
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›