Important Eminent Domain Victory in New York
by Timothy Sandefur
Inversecondemnation.com points to this very significant victory in an eminent domain case in New York. So far as I know, this is the first post-Kelo decision to be based on the idea of pretext: that is, in which the court has found that contrary to the government's claims, the taking was actually to benefit a private party. That's different from cases like the Ohio decision in which the court found that the concept of "public use" did not include economic development. Unfortunately, because courts generally use the "rational basis" standard of review (read: cover their eyes and look the other way) judges are usually incapable of discriminating between supposedly "public" economic development takings and the private takings that are done to serve a private interest.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›