My speech to the Federalist Society at the University of Michigan Law School
I recently spoke to the Federalist Society at the University of Michigan Law School about PLF’s cert petition in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky. In Mansky, we ask the Supreme Court to review a political apparel ban at polling places across Minnesota. The ban encompasses all sorts of apparel, from t-shirts that feature the logo of the Chamber of Commerce to those that feature the logo of the AFL-CIO. In function, the ban create a speech-free zone at the polling place, and speech-free zones are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The petition has been relisted by the Court twice, showing that it is under strong consideration by the justices. You can read a transcript of the speech here.
In addition, I spoke to students at a seminar on civil rights advocacy. I told the students about PLF’s rich history, from its early Supreme Court victory in Nollan to more recent wins in cases like Sackett and Hawkes. The way to best serve our history, however, is to pave the way for an even better future. We’re doing just that. We currently have eight petitions filed with the Supreme Court. Those cases could set precedent of nationwide importance, from restoring constitutional limits on federal power to protecting property rights by giving property owners their day in federal court.
Our Supreme Court victories are just a part of our success. Just this week, we got California to rescind the state’s onerous “certificate of authenticity” requirement for the sale of autographed books. At the same time, we’re continuing our fight, on behalf of a family-owned dairy, to invalidate Wisconsin’s protectionist butter grading law. I hope I convinced some of the students in Civil Rights Advocacy to think about a career as a civil rights advocate. If so, they’d do well to consider Pacific Legal Foundation.
What to read next
ReasonTV released a new video that showcases our client Peggy Fontenot and her case against the Attorney General of Oklahoma. If you’ll recall, last year, Oklahoma enacted a new law that limits who may market art as American Indian-made.
Justice Don Willett of the Texas Supreme Court endured the partisan gauntlet of the Senate hearing on his nomination to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The hearing only confirmed what has been known for some time: Justice Willett will serve the federal judiciary with integrity, wit, and commitment.
Earlier this year, the City of Seattle shocked the people of Washington—indeed, many across the nation—when it decided to impose an income tax on so-called “high-earners” in direct defiance of the Washington State Supreme Court, which has repeatedly held that the state constitution’s uniformity clause prohibits targeted income taxes.
PLF and several allied organizations submitted a petition for rule-making to the federal agencies that administer the Endangered Species Act. The petition asks the agencies to define “species” and “subspecies,” terms which, although critical to the Act’s operation, are left undefined by statute and regulation.
Next Friday, I’ll be presenting oral argument in the Ninth Circuit in Cedar Point Nursery v. Gould. The case involves a challenge to the ALRB’s access regulation, which allows union organizers to use the private property of agricultural employers to solicit potential union members.