Press Release

PLF applauds nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Arlington, Virginia; July 9, 2018: Pacific Legal Foundation praised the qualifications and fitness of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States following his nomination by President Trump today.

“Judge Kavanaugh is incredibly well qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, and in his 12 years on the federal bench, he has demonstrated the right approach to judging,” said Todd Gaziano, Pacific Legal Foundation’s Chief of Legal Policy and Strategic Research. “When they are faithful to the Constitution’s text and original public meaning, judges like Kavanaugh play a vital role in protecting individual rights, including freedom of speech, economic liberty, property rights, and other guarantees of freedom. Justices on the Supreme Court who carefully enforce the Constitution’s protections also ensure the other branches observe the proper separation of powers when they write laws and regulations and take other executive actions.”

“Americans expect judges to enforce the text and original understanding of the Constitution and statutes, but none of us can predict how they will rule in future cases. Indeed, we do not want judges who will pre-judge outcomes in cases not yet before them,” Gaziano continued. “Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated a proper approach to his judicial duties which limits personal bias and upholds the rule of law. He has also shown a special understanding of and commitment to the Constitution’s structural limits that were designed to protect individual liberty.”

PLF has won 10 cases before the Supreme Court, and it is directly representing clients in two cases that will be argued during the first week of the High Court’s next term in early October: Knick v. Scott Township, PA, and Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service.

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) is the nation’s leading public interest legal organization devoted to preserving individual rights. Since 1973, donor-supported PLF has successfully litigated for limited government, private property rights, and economic liberty in the nation’s highest courts.


Case Commentary

See all posts

By James S. Burling

Weekly litigation report — January 19, 2019

Oral argument held again in Knick at the Supreme Courf

On January 16, the Supreme Court heard reargument in Knick v Scott Township, the case where Ms Knick sued the town after the town declared that the public could trespass on her property in order to search for some old stones, claimed to be colonial-era graves Ms Knick is seeking the right to sue in federal court The argument went well and the Justices understand our arguments We are cautiously optimistic that at least five justices will agree that landowners should be able to sue local government in federal court when the government takes private property For more, see

Read more

By David J. Deerson

PLF files Answering Brief in Center for Biological Diversity v. Zinke

Today, PLF filed our Answering Brief in the Ninth Circuit in the case of Center for Biological Diversity v. Zinke urging the court to affirm the District of Alaska’s dismissal. During the … ›

Read more

By Kathy Hoekstra

Ms. Knick goes to Washington. Again.

When you first meet Rose Knick, you’re hard-pressed to find evidence that she could trigger a true property rights renaissance across the country. That was certainly the case for the … ›

Read more