Articles

Coral Construction set for hearing before the CA Supreme Court

April 20, 2010 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Author: Joshua Thompson After nearly three years, the California Supreme Court has set a date for oral argument in Coral Construction v. City and County of San Francisco.  The argument will be held May 4, 2010, at 9 pm in San Francisco. PLF Principal Attorney Sharon Browne will be arguing the case for the petitioners. … ...

Articles

Coverage of Coral Construction argument

May 05, 2010 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Author: Joshua Thompson Yesterday PLF's Sharon Browne argued before the California Supreme Court in Coral Construction v. City and County of San Francisco.  The court was deciding on the constitutionality of Proposition 209 — California's landmark constitutional amendment that prohibits both discrimination and preferences on the ...

Articles

Chief Justice George and environmental law

July 15, 2010 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Author:  Damien M. Schiff Yesterday, California Supreme Court Justice Ronald George announced that he will step down in January.  A few years ago, my colleague Tim Sandefur and I wrote a white paper reviewing the modern California Supreme Court, trying to categorize its jurisprudence and compare the quality of its output to its predeces ...

Articles

Cal Supremes will hear Prop 8 standing case

February 16, 2011 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Author:  Damien M. Schiff Today the California Supreme Court voted unanimously to accept the certified question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals about whether the official sponsors of Proposition 8, a voter-approved initiative that effectively banned same-sex marriage, have the right to defend that measure's legal validity in ...

Articles

California Supreme Court rules : only defendants who cause harm are liable in tort

January 12, 2012 | By DEBORAH LA FETRA

The title of this post may seem self-evident, but it is nevertheless reassuring that the California Supreme Court unanimously recognized the inherent logic in this principle, given the constant efforts by the plaintiffs’ bar to expand the reach of tort liability. The Court rejected a recent effort to expand products liability in this morning ...

Articles

California’s pathetic attempt to defend the University of Texas

August 14, 2012 | By JOSHUA THOMPSON

Yesterday, the State of California filed this brief in support of the University of Texas in Fisher v. Univerity of Texas at Austin.  It is quite the embarassment.  Most of the brief is the usual, to-be-expected leftist pseudo-science touting the benefits of “diversity.”  As PLF pointed out in its brief in Fisher, there is no & ...

Articles

Are you listening, California Supreme Court?

November 26, 2012 | By DEBORAH LA FETRA

For the second time this year, the United States Supreme Court slapped down a state supreme court that refused to abide by the High Court’s arbitration decisions. In today’s unsigned opinion in Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Howard, the miscreant tribunal this time was the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which struck down a noncompete agree ...

Articles

California supreme court to decide whether fish and game commission should correct mistakes

February 28, 2013 | By TONY FRANCOIS

In December we reported on a California appellate court decision which says that when the California Fish & Game Commission erroneously lists a species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), it cannot correct the mistake.  The case arises out of petition that a forestry association and a timber company filed with the Commission t ...

Articles

California Supreme Court to hear important charter school case

April 17, 2013 | By JOSHUA THOMPSON

We learned some great news this afternoon as the California Supreme Court agreed to hear California Charter School Association v. LASUD.  You can read all about the case — and PLF’s brief to the Supreme Court — here.  This will be the first time that the California Supreme Court has interpreted Proposition 39, California ...