On January 13, the U.S. Supreme Court granted our request to resolve a lingering controversy over which court has the authority to hear our challenge to the Corps and EPA’s expansive rule redefining “waters of the United States.” We argue the Clean Water Act authorizes challenges to the scope of the Act in the federal district courts while the government argues such challenges must be brought in the federal courts of appeals. The lower courts are split on this question. But when the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided it had exclusive jurisdiction to hear the challenge to the WOTUS rule, the Supreme Court agreed to review the decision and resolve the controversy. The High Court will issue its opinion by the end of June.
Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals put a hold on all briefing in that court with respect to the merits of the challenge until the Supreme Court has ruled on the venue question.
What to read next
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›
PLF scored another victory against bureaucratic overreach yesterday, when the federal court in Alaska dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. This dismissal is PLF’s latest success … ›