Closed: The Purcell brothers received their permit.

When the State of New York legalized cannabis in 2021, William and Emmet Purcell seized the opportunity to plant roots in the burgeoning industry.

By September 2023, William and Emmet had established their business, Valencia Ag, in upstate New York. They signed a $2,000-per-month lease—plus utilities. All that remained was to get a license. Valencia Ag submitted its application to the State’s Cannabis Control Board on October 12, 2023.

The brothers met all of the eligibility requirements related to finances, residency, and the like. But they soon learned the process was rigged when their application was placed at a disadvantage simply because of their race and sex.

New York’s cannabis law requires at least 50% of business licenses go to so-called social and economic equity applicants. These applicants also pay half as much as their non-priority counterparts in applications and annual renewal fees.

License priority is also given to minority and women business owners. Race and sex alone are enough to receive prioritized review of applications and granting of licenses.

William and Emmet did not qualify for priority licensure, and they did not fall into any other neutral category for priority licensure. They were concerned they wouldn’t even get an application review, let alone have a license granted, simply because of their race and sex.

Government at all levels is supposed to treat every citizen equally, regardless of race and sex. New York’s cannabis licensing scheme does the exact opposite. It classifies and prioritizes businesses based on the owners’ race and sex when all that should matter is if a company meets objective legal requirements.

As a result, the State of New York is boxing out opportunity based on immutable characteristics that have nothing to do with an individual’s ability to run a competent and safe business. The Constitution’s equal protection guarantee protects the right to earn a living free from unjust race or gender preferences in government licensing.

So the Purcell brothers fought back. Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation at no charge, William and Emmet challenged New York’s illegal discrimination in the licensure of cannabis businesses in federal court. After their lawsuit was filed, the brothers were granted their license, and the case was dismissed.

What’s At Stake?

  • The government must treat every citizen equally under the law, regardless of race and sex. Laws that grant business licenses based on the race or sex of a company’s owner violate the Constitution.
  • The right of anyone to earn a living is fundamental. Your race or sex shouldn’t determine whether you can pursue a living of your choosing.

Case Timeline

August 05, 2025
PLF Voluntary Motion to Dismiss
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
March 25, 2025
Decision and Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
March 13, 2024
Complaint
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

CASES AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM. SENT TO YOUR INBOX.

Subscribe to the weekly Docket for dispatches from the front lines.