Active: Federal lawsuit challenges illegal office requirement in West Virginia

Entrepreneurship, innovation, and real estate are a part of Derek Eisenberg’s DNA. He grew up in a family of homebuilders and entered the real estate industry straight out of grad school. He began appraising in the 1990s and later joined several private property sale databases known as the Multiple Listing Service, or MLS, in Mid-Atlantic and New England states.  

During the dot-com boom, Derek launched Continental Real Estate, a totally online brokerage offering flexible, cost-effective services. Customers can choose entire full-service packages or choose only the specific services they need. 

As Derek explains, “A traditional broker might only sell a Cadillac, whereas we sell a stripped-down Chevy with crank windows, no AC and only an AM radio and let customers add the options they want.” 

Derek hopes to expand into all 50 states. Standing in the way, however, are several states’ requirements that brokers maintain physical offices within their borders—a completely antiquated condition as modern technology makes local offices unnecessary. These laws are mere protectionism, meant to protect in-state incumbents by discouraging market entry and blocking intrastate online services by out-of-state competitors. The result is fewer realtors and higher consumer prices. In West Virginia alone, Derek must pay about $2,000 a year for an in-state presence, and the cost only compounds with each state he adds to Continental’s reach. 

West Virginia’s physical office requirement isn’t just outdated. It’s unconstitutional. It denies both Derek’s opportunity to do business and West Virginians’ opportunity to access innovative, cost-saving services. 

Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation free of charge, Derek is defending his right to earn a living in West Virginia, free of the government’s unjust economic protectionism. 

In the meantime, Derek’s fight extends beyond West Virginia. He is currently challenging a similar requirement in Nevada and stands ready to contest other states’ burdensome laws that unfairly separate people from opportunity. 

What’s At Stake?

  • Subjecting entrepreneurs like Derek Eisenberg to burdensome conditions simply because of geographic location is discriminatory and denies opportunities for both entrepreneurs and consumers alike.
  • Requiring businesses to have a brick-and-mortar office in order to operate is protectionism, pure and simple.

Case Timeline

December 19, 2024
PLF Complaint
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia

FOR MEDIA INQUIRIES:

CASES AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM. SENT TO YOUR INBOX.

Subscribe to the biweekly Docket for dispatches from the front lines.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.