Goodwin v. Walton County, Florida

New Florida law ends unconstitutional land grab

Cases > Property Rights > Goodwin v. Walton County, Florida
Case Status: Won: A new law requires counties to follow the rules.

A Walton County ordinance banned signs on privately owned beaches, hoping to allow the public to trespass on private beaches without having to pay for the use. County officials threatened Edward and Delanie Goodwin with large fines for keeping two “private property” signs and one small sign saying “If Walton County Wants My Property, It Must Pay For It — U.S. Constitution.” The First Amendment protects the Goodwins’ rights to post signs on their property. The County’s ban leaves the Goodwins with no reasonable alternative means to alert the beachgoing public to their property rights, or to speak about other matters. PLF represented the Goodwin’s challenge to the unconstitutional ordinance.

The Goodwins own property in the Florida panhandle, adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico. They built a house on their land in 1978 and privately own the dry beach down to the mean high water line; the tidal area below that line belongs to the public. Spring Break and the summer draw large crowds to Walton County’s beautiful beaches. While most beachgoers are respectful, sometimes these crowds bring loud parties, alcohol abuse, and littering. The Goodwins, despite clearly marking their property’s boundaries and posting “No Trespassing” and “Private Property” signs, have still encountered strangers intruding on their land. At times, individuals have set up tents, allowed their pets to defecate, and left refuse on the Goodwins’ property.  Approximately once a year, strangers have crossed their dry beach without permission and entered their home. Understandably, the Goodwins—like landowners anywhere else—want to protect their family and control who is allowed on their land.

Walton County, which itself drove vehicles on the Goodwin’s beach, objected to the Goodwins’ speech in support of private property rights and passed an ordinance banning all “obstructions” on the beach – including signs. Unless the Goodwins and their neighbors use signs and markers to indicate where their property begins and ends, it will be very difficult for well-meaning members of the public (let alone less honorable individuals) to respect their private property rights. In fact, the Walton County Sheriff will not enforce trespass laws without them. Thus, without the ability to put up signs and mark the boundary of their property, the Goodwins lose important private property rights, including their right to exclude strangers and protect their family’s privacy.

A new law passed on March 23, 2018 however brought the case to an end. The measure requires counties to go to court if they want to claim any right for the public to use private property.

Read full story

What’s at stake?

  • The county’s ban leaves the Goodwins, and other waterfront homeowners and landowners, with no reasonable alternative way to let the beach going public know about their property boundary and their property rights, or to post messages about any other issues.
  • Without the ability to put up signs and mark the boundary of their land, the Goodwins will lose important private property rights, including their right to protect their family’s privacy, and to protect the fragile vegetation along the edge of their beach property, which secures and stabilizes the upland dunes.

Case Timeline

Goodwin v. Walton County, Florida Documents 11-14-16 (1)

November 14, 2016 Download

Goodwin v. Walton County, Florida Documents 11-14-16 (2)

November 14, 2016 Download

Goodwin v. Walton County, Florida Documents 7-8-16

July 08, 2016 Download

Case Attorneys

Related Posts

Donate