Won: Second Circuit rules in favor of antique dealers’ First Amendment rights

The Art and Antique Dealers League of America, Inc. is the oldest and principal antiques and fine arts organization in the United States. Formed in 1926 to connect and support dealers and collectors, the league today has more than 110 members representing over 60 different fields of expertise.

The National Antique and Art Dealers Association of America, Inc. is a selective, invitation-only non-profit trade organization of the country’s leading dealers. Through many years of study and experience, its members are highly regarded for their integrity and fairness in all transactions.

Members of both organizations have galleries and shops in New York, many in Manhattan’s antique district. As with most valuable items, in-person viewing is an important aspect of antique sales, especially antiques containing ivory.

Recognizing that there is no evidence of a connection between antiques and modern elephant poaching, federal law allows the sale of older antiques containing ivory, as well as newer items containing a small amount of ivory.

Specifically, the rules allow interstate and international commerce in “antique articles” that are at least 100 years old, as well as non-antique artwork containing “de minimis” amounts of ivory that is at least 45 years old and has been in the U.S. for at least 30 years.

These limitations didn’t go far enough for lawmakers in New York. Recognizing it cannot ban what federal law authorizes, the state passed an ivory law in 2014 that prohibits display and sale of antiques with more than 20% ivory—even though New York acknowledges that they may be sold to buyers in other states and internationally.

The New York law allows dealers to show store visitors the disfavored items only in photographs and catalogs, and only if the items are labeled as “not for sale in New York.”

Virtually no one is willing to purchase valuable antiques without first physically inspecting them. Saddled with this government restraint on their speech and their livelihoods, the dealers sued for the right to sell the items consistent with federal law, and to be able to display items with the same “not for sale in New York” disclaimer, but they were rejected by a federal trial court.

The First Amendment prohibits government from permitting an activity but banning speech about that activity. By restricting speech related to certain antique sales that are allowed under federal law, New York’s display restriction provision is unconstitutional.

Represented free of charge by PLF, both dealer organizations appealed the lower court’s ruling. In November 2024 the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the trial court’s decision, recognizing that New York’s restriction on advertising lawful antiques and works of art violates the First Amendment rights of dealers.

What’s At Stake?

  • It makes no sense for the government to permit an item to be sold—even in a limited way—but to prohibit the seller from talking about it via its display. Such restrictions are prohibited by the First Amendment.

Case Timeline

November 13, 2024
Opinion by the Circuit Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
October 05, 2021
Appellant's Reply Brief
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
June 15, 2021
Appellant's Opening Brief
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

FOR MEDIA INQUIRIES:

CASES AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM. SENT TO YOUR INBOX.

Subscribe to the biweekly Docket for dispatches from the front lines.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.