Gopher frog back in the news!
As noted here, we filed suit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service earlier in the month challenging the agency’s over board designation of “critical habitat” for the dusky gopher frog. Among other things, the Service included a large area of private land in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, that the Service admits is unsuitable for the frog’s habitat. PLF represents Markle Interests, LLC, which holds a minority interest in the land. Today, the majority landowners joined our suit by filing a complaint of their own.
In part, the related press release states:
“Attorneys for three landowners in St. Tammany Parish filed suit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service today for illegally designating 1,544 acres of private land as ‘critical habitat’ for the dusky gopher frog.
“The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on behalf of P & F Lumber Co. (2000), LLC, St. Tammany Land Co., LLC, and PF Monroe Properties, LLC. It follows the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s “critical habitat” designation which was issued in June, 2012. As the lawsuit notes, the designation included 1,544 acres of privately-owned property that is neither occupied, nor usable, by the frog, as it contains none of the frog’s habitat elements.
“Edward B. Poitevent, II, the manager of P & F Lumber Co. and a representative of the other owners, said this about the critical habitat designation: ‘While this case is about an ill-advised land grab by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in one Louisiana parish, it’s also about how property rights are being jeopardized by governmental intrusion from coast to coast. Until now, federal officials have never attempted to do what they did here — set aside private property as the critical habitat for a species knowing that the land is clearly unsuitable for the species and that the species is gone from the land.'”
Echoing the concerns of PLF, Mr. Poitevent continued:
“If this rule stands, any land anywhere in the U.S. can have restrictions imposed merely by federal bureaucrats claiming the land may someday be used for species recovery.”
We expect another party to join our suit in the near future. Weyerhaeuser filed it’s 60-day Notice of Intent to Sue on December 21, 2012.
learn more about
Markle v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
In 2012, government bureaucrats designated more than 1,500 acres of privately owned land in Louisiana as a “critical habitat” for the federally-protected dusky gopher frog. Regardless of the fact the frog neither lives anywhere in the state nor could live there, the critical habitat designation makes the land off-limits for all of the property owners including Ed Poitevent and his business, Markle Interests, and the Weyerhaeuser Company. On January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it will hear a challenge to this blatant abuse of the Endangered Species Act. PLF represents the Poitevent family and related businesses, and will represent their interests before the Court.Read more
What to read next
In February, eight Black and Hispanic families filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Connecticut State Department of Education’s race-based enrollment quotas for Hartford’s magnet schools. This policy mandates that 25% of a … ›