Willmore Lumber Company, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, et al.

Family-run lumber company challenges OSHA’s power to skip the courtroom and be its own judge

Willmore Lumber challenges OSHA’s in-house enforcement process, arguing it violates constitutional rights to a neutral judge and jury.

Atlantic Veal & Lamb, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

NLRB’s in-house tribunal undermines fairness and rule of law

Atlantic Veal asks the D.C. Circuit to halt NLRB in-house tribunals, arguing they deny businesses a fair hearing in real court.

King Ranch v. Washington State Department of Ecology

Washington ranchers fight for their constitutional right to a jury trial

Ranchers face $3.7 million in penalties from state regulators—but are being denied their constitutional right to a jury trial to fight back.

Goldberg v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities

Department of Banking and Securities violates financial professional’s right to a jury trial

Pennsylvania-based financial professional sued the Department of Banking and Securities for an unconstitutional agency hearing.

Philip Serpe v. Federal Trade Commission

Longtime racehorse trainer fights unconstitutional process and punishment for speculative doping allegations

Philip Serpe was dragged through an arbitrary and unconstitutional administrative process based on unproven allegations of an HISA violation.

Princess Awesome & Stonemaier Games v. Customs

Board game company fights unconstitutional tariffs

Jamey, Rebecca, Eva, Quent, Linda, Pete, and several others are suing the government in federal court for a refund on the tariffs they’ve paid and to restore their right to run their businesses free of illegal government interference, to reassert the proper limits of presidential authority, and restore the separation of powers.

Hiran Management v. NLRB

NLRB’s in-house tribunal undermines fairness and rule of law

Nick and Hiran Management are now fighting back with a federal appeal of both the NLRB’s final decision and the agency’s unconstitutional exercise of judicial power through its in-house tribunal system.