Do No Harm and FAIR are fighting back with a federal lawsuit challenging Arkansas’s use of race quotas to decide who can serve on these regulatory boards.
Jason Murchison is fighting back with a federal lawsuit challenging Newport Beach’s unlawful restrictions on surf lessons. A win will restore his fundamental right to earn a living and protect the rights of all entrepreneurs to do the same for themselves, consumers, and their communities
Sandy Chiong is fighting back against a race-based mandate with a federal lawsuit to ensure that all qualified candidates can compete equally for public service, regardless of race.
Do No Harm's federal lawsuit challenges Tennessee’s racial quotas for chiropractor and medical board membership as violating the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee. Victory would ensure that all candidates can compete equally for any state advisory board, regardless of race.
An elementary school is not a totalitarian environment in which students have no rights. The district court was wrong to claim otherwise and set a dangerous precedent, totally stripping elementary school students of their First Amendment rights.
Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation free of charge, Shellye Horowitz and Dr. McBride are challenging California’s licensing law that threatens patients’ access to necessary, specialized medical care and rights of qualified specialists to treat them.
Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation at no charge, Do No Harm is fighting back. Its federal lawsuit challenges the Montana public boards’ race and gender preferences as violating the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. Victory would ensure that all candidates can compete equally to serve on the medical board, regardless of race and gender.
Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation at no charge, Do No Harm is fighting back. Its federal lawsuit challenges the Louisiana medical board’s race-based membership quota as violating the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. Its victory would ensure that all candidates can compete equally for any city advisory board, regardless of race.
Violating New Jersey’s telehealth restriction is punishable by criminal charges and hefty fines and can put the doctor’s medical license at risk. New Jersey’s telehealth restrictions are not just wrong, they’re also unconstitutional. Placing undue burdens on both out-of-state physicians and New Jersey patients that far outweigh any benefits violates the Constitution’s Dormant Commerce Clause and Privileges and Immunities Clause. Also, just as physicians have a First Amendment right to speak with potential and existing patients via telehealth, physicians and their patients have the right to receive information from each other. The government cannot use licensing requirements to impede the exchange of information between patients and their doctors.