Lathfield Investments, LLC v. City of Lathrup Village
Property owners ask Supreme Court to clarify process for constitutional claims
Lathfield Investments, a family of small property companies in Michigan, purchased a commercial property in Lathrup Village with the goal of providing affordable space for local entrepreneurs. Their agreements with occupants include confidentiality provisions—protecting occupants’ names and business details from being disclosed. But the City of Lathrup Village requires property owners to obtain a landlord […]
SnakeOut, Inc. v. Charlton Bonham
California prohibits entrepreneur from charging fees in wilderness safety courses for dogs
California prohibits entrepreneur from charging fees in wilderness safety courses for dogs
Cornbread Hemp v. Roberts
Tennessee forces hemp business into outdated “three-tier” system
When Congress passed the 2018 Farm Bill legalizing hemp-derived products, entrepreneurs like Jim Higdon and Eric Zipperle saw an opportunity to help people while building a business. Inspired by Kentucky’s rich history of hemp cultivation and driven by a desire to set high standards in this emerging industry, Higdon and Zipperle co-founded Cornbread Hemp. Since […]
In re: Teancum Properties
Utah property owners challenge Army Corps’ wetlands overreach after Supreme Court ruling
Teancum Properties filed an administrative appeal challenging the Corps’ jurisdictional determination. The case argues that federal agencies cannot ignore Supreme Court precedent that protects property owners from regulatory overreach.
Wavehuggers LLC and Helina Beck v. Armando Quintero
Surf instructor fights California’s monopoly on beach lessons
Helina Beck filed a federal lawsuit challenging that the state cannot grant exclusive teaching privileges to favored businesses while denying others the right to earn a living through constitutionally protected instruction on beaches that belong to all Californians.
Integrated Life Choices v. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
Nebraska care provider battles State’s costly training takeover
In August 2025, ILC filed a lawsuit challenging Provider Bulletin 24-01 on multiple grounds: violation of separation of powers, denial of due process, and failure to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act.
Marcy Markes v. Andrew Bailey, et al.
Missouri forces nurse practitioners to buy permission to work—from doctors
Marcy Markes is fighting to strike down a Missouri CPA law so that she, as well as her fellow and future nurse practitioners, can practice to the full extent of their qualifications and experience without government-mandated physician middlemen.
Maack v. Reynolds
Rideshare driver pumps the brakes on California’s interstate discrimination
Ted Maack has filed a federal lawsuit challenging that the driver’s license requirement violates the Interstate Commerce Clause by creating protectionist barriers that favor California residents at the expense of out-of-state workers.
Dr. Sean Wells, et al. v. Kennedy, et al.
Physical therapists defend their livelihoods and the patients Medicare won’t let them treat
Dr. Wells and UPTA are fighting back. Their federal lawsuit challenges Medicare’s discriminatory ban on private-pay physical therapy to protect their livelihoods and broaden Americans’ access to providers who best fit their needs—not the government’s.