Walls' petition argues that the government cannot use the legislative process as an excuse to bar property owners from the courts.
The Ciners argue that the government cannot use administrative technicalities to bar property owners from accessing the courts.
The owners of two California malls are petitioning the United States Supreme Court to strike down California’s compelled speech requirement.
Natural Lands petitioned the Supreme Court to take the case and affirm that you can seek relief in federal court when the government violates your right to due process, even if you have not exhausted every potential state-level procedure.
The Supreme Court vacated the Sixth Circuit Court’s ruling against the Pungs, sending their home equity theft case back to the lower court.
The county sold her home at auction for $499,007—nearly twenty times what she owed. Under the Constitution's Takings Clause, as the Supreme Court confirmed in Tyler v. Hennepin County, the government must pay property owners for any excess value beyond the debt owed.
Kari only learned she could claim the surplus proceeds after a lawyer contacted her. Although she tried to follow the State’s labyrinthine process, it failed her—and enriched the government at her expense—in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Forcing property owners to chase down their own money through processes that are designed to fail only traps people into accidentally waiving their rights. The Michigan and United States Constitutions demand that government pay the owner for extra property it takes, at a minimum, by selling the property and returning any surplus to former owners. No matter what claim processes lawmakers put on the books, once a government takes property, government is duty-bound to pay for it.
Forcing property owners to chase down their own money through processes that are designed to fail only traps people into accidentally waiving their rights. The Michigan and United States Constitutions demand that government pay the owner for extra property it takes, at a minimum, by selling the property and returning any surplus to former owners. No matter what claim processes lawmakers put on the books, once a government takes property, government is duty-bound to pay for it.